Monday, February 18, 2008

Remembering Walks on Beaker Street

Over at The Hits Just Keep On Comin’ yesterday, JB the DJ wrote about manning the microphone Sunday as the Madison area struggled with the aftermath of a ice-and-snow storm. The folks at his radio group’s news-talk station “went into full mode,” he said, providing listeners with information about the storm and its aftermath. At the same time, in what he called “our little classic-rock corner of the building,” he did plenty of that himself. And he closed his post this way:

“And I know tonight that however I might choose to pay the mortgage, whatever I might consider my primary career to be, I am, in the end, a radio man. I’ve been one since I was 11, and to my last day on Earth, whether that’s sometime this week or when I’m 101, it’s what I’m going to be.”

I understand that. I imagine a lot of you do, too. I thought for years that I would be in radio, and the medium still fascinates me. As I’ve related, I spent some time in college at KVSC, St. Cloud State’s student station. But I never worked a day in radio for a couple of reasons, the greatest of which was that I learned that I can write better than I can talk, and I’m pretty good at talking. So I wound up over the years in newspapering, in public relations, in education and in a few other things. Still, my fascination with radio endured. Every now and then, I wonder what I would have found along the road not taken, and I remember the winter when radio pulled me in.

I mentioned the other day the second-hand RCA radio that my grandfather gave me, the one I listened to the days I was home ill from high school. During the evenings, starting when I was fifteen, I would go exploring on that radio. I’d move it over to the card table that served as my desk and slowly move the tuning bar from one side of the AM band to the other. The signals on that band, of course, travel farther at night than during the day, so an hour spent “radio roaming,” as I called it, could provide the sounds of distant cities.

When I found a strong signal, I’d start an entry in a notebook, drawing a diagram that showed the tuning bar in relation to the nearest frequency number on the face of the radio (this was long before one could tune a radio digitally). With luck, the station signal would stay strong enough for me to hear the station break at the top of the hour, and I’d jot into the notebook the station’s call letters and its home city. Based on what I heard through the whoops and howls of interference, I’d make a guess at the type of programming it played and jot that down, too.

I eventually had a list of more than a hundred stations that I’d heard and identified by call letters. I didn’t always find out where they were, nor was I always correct in determining their format. Some of the bigger stations, easy to find, were KDKA in Pittsburgh, KCMO in Kansas City and KMOX in St. Louis. I also heard stations from towns large and small throughout the Midwest and into the south. And then there was KAAY in Little Rock, Arkansas, and its nighttime program, Beaker Street.

There was something called “progressive radio” in the late 1960s and early 1970s, a format that was far less defined and less stringent than any station would play today. From listening to it back then, I think I can safely define it as this: The DJ could play almost any rock music he liked as long as it wasn’t two things: profane or a Top 40 hit. (There was an exception to the second part of that rule for groups like the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, I think: If a jock wanted to play “Revolution” or “Honky Tonk Women,” he – or in rare cases, she – could do so. Most DJs would dig deeper than that, though, and play selections like “Sexy Sadie” or “Jigsaw Puzzle” instead.)

Listening to Top 40 during my youth was an exercise in probability, just as it is today: When you heard “Honky Tonk Women,” you knew that by the top of the hour you’d hear “Ruby, Don’t Take Your Love To Town.” Listening to a “progressive” station was an adventure, as you never knew what would be coming next. And the best progressive programming I heard was on KAAY in the evenings, on Beaker Street. (The show has often been mislabeled by me and others over the years as Bleecker Street, most likely after the similarly named street that runs through Manhattan’s Greenwich Village, the street Simon & Garfunkel sang about on Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.)

I spent a lot of time listening to Beaker Street for the next few years, hearing performers and songs I might not otherwise have heard. From Hendrix to Sweetwater, from Mother Earth to Blues Project, from the Grateful Dead to Fleetwood Mac (then just emerging from its original identity as a blues band, years before Stevie and Lindsey), from King Crimson to Mason Proffit and beyond, Beaker Street roamed through the universe of rock albums. I didn’t always look further in those days into the groups and artists I heard, but in later years, as I explored anew the music of those times, I frequently recalled tracks I’d heard on Beaker Street. And as I looked back, I realized that the program had provided not so much a coherent sound as a complete universe where a massive range of music belonged, a universe where, if groups and songs complemented each other, they often did so by way of contrast. (Happily, Beaker Street is back on the air after some years away, though on a different station. Check it out here.)

I don’t know what happened to my notebooks, and I’m not exactly sure when I quit sitting with my radio, trying to find new stations. Sometime during my first two years of college, I guess. It’s easy to find radio stations now, for the most part. I can go to a site like radio-locator.com and wander around the world, listening to stations that would have been far beyond the reach of my old RCA radio. It’s kind of fun to do so, but I dunno. Even if I were sixteen again, logging onto a station’s website probably wouldn’t be as much fun as bending my ear to the speaker, listening so intently for coherent sounds through the whistles and the static.

New York Rock Ensemble, Roll Over (1970)
I saw a reference at a board I frequent recently, asking members for music by the New York Rock & Roll Ensemble. It sounded familiar, so I went to the stacks and pulled out this album, one of the group’s later albums, made after a slight name change.

And when I listened to it, it sounded like something I might have heard on Beaker Street during those years. There’s nothing flashy about it, although sometimes the instrumental parts are a tad excessive, but that was the mode in 1970. It struck me as good, solid, turn of the 60s/70s rock music. But I also realized how little I know about the group.

All-Music Guide says that the group was formed by three Juilliard Music Conservatory-trained musicians: Michael Kamen, Marty Fulterman and Dorian Rudnytsky, who “decided in the late '60s in New York that they could make bigger bucks as rock stars than as classical musicians.” The group’s first two albums – the self-titled debut in 1968 and Faithful Friends in 1969 – had the group playing rock music on classical instruments and classical music on rock instruments. AMG notes that the results of the experiment were “inconclusive,” although Leonard Bernstein invited the group to play at one of his famous Young People’s Concerts with the New York Philharmonic Orchestra.

Following a third album – Reflections was a collaboration with Greek composer Manos Hadjidakis, who had scored the 1960 film Never On Sunday – the group changed its name to the New York Rock Ensemble, was signed to Columbia, and recorded Roll Over, its first album of basic rock. It was the group’s most successful record, quite likely because one of its tracks, “Fields of Joy,” was included on Different Strokes, a Columbia sampler. (Success is a relative thing, to be sure; the album never made the Top 40.)

It’s a good record, though one gets conflicting reports from various review collections. The earliest edition I have of the Rolling Stone Record Guide (1979) says, “This is the group that made it name by wearing tuxedos, playing society gigs and trying to adapt Bach to rock. They failed miserably at all that overblown stuff, then went out and made this tremendous rock & roll album. ‘Running Down the Highway,’ ‘Anaconda’ and ‘Fields of Joy’ are all top-notch songs, and the band plays with good taste and fire.”

That assessment is pretty congruent with what I thought yesterday when I dropped the record on the turntable. On the other hand, AMG says, “Considering the original trio's lofty ambitions to meld classical and popular music, their fourth release is solid but unexceptional rock.”

I tend to agree with the Rolling Stone guide’s assessment. Along with the three songs singled out in the review, I’d note “Traditional Order” and the album’s closer, the whimsical “Ride, Ride My Lady,” as tracks worth noting.

(Oddly, the running time for “Traditional Order” on the label is 4:08, but when I ripped the mp3 and pulled it into the player, it came out at 6:03. Perhaps the band, with Columbia’s help, was trimming the listed running time in hopes of getting some airplay. That’s the only thing I can think of for that kind of discrepancy. Of course, it could just be a typo. Additionally, I’ve seen both 1970 and 1971 listed as the year for the record’s release. The record jacket has no date, but I’ve seen 1970 more frequently, so I went with that.)

Tracks:
Running Down The Highway
Gravedigger
Law and Order
Fields of Joy
The King Is Dead
Don’t Wait Too Long
Anaconda
Beside You
Traditional Order
Ride, Ride My Lady


New York Rock Ensemble – Roll Over (1970)
52.61 MB zip file, mp3s from vinyl at 192 kbps

Note: There is a skip in “Traditional Order” that cannot be repaired. I also thought I heard a spot of distortion in the same track, but I could not find it again. Other than that, the sound is pretty clean.

9 comments:

Stephanie said...

Hey! I thought (and perhaps this is an error due to my memory) that you were grabbed at the very last moment to do an ad-lib on-air interview for someone during your college years!

That's a DAY in radio...no?

whiteray said...

Yeah, that happened, and I did other things on and off the air at KVSC, but I didn't get paid for them . . . so I never "worked" in radio.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if that's the same Michael Kamen who went on to be a producer and composer of film scores?

Anonymous said...

Per anonymous: Indeed, it is the same Michael Kamen- which made orchestrating for rock bands, like Metallica, so ironic...

Anonymous said...

Thanks for ROLL OVER, Greg! I knew you could find it! And WHOA... you're the only other person I know who owned the original Rolling Stone Record Guide of 1979. I still have my dog-eared copy. Man, I hated Dave Marsh, smug bastard... because he dissed ALL my favorite bands and albums of the 70s. What a class-A jerk he was. Here's a link for anyone interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_Stone_Album_Guide

Conan said...

You have missed, hopefully temporarily, the continued success of Beaker Street.

"Clyde Clifford" found a home the past several years Sunday nights on "Magic 105" in Little Rock, spinning the same brand of music we used to listen to those many years ago (I'm from minnesota as well). I rediscovered him a couple of years ago wondering whether anyone else remembered Beaker Street. Since then I spent my Sunday evenings parked in front of the internet listening to it.

Ironically, days after your blog entry, the station changed. You must check out beakerstreet.com to get the full story, and to see the outstanding playlists (and some shows to download).

Now if I could only find Beaker Theater....

Steve W.

David Miller said...

Thank you for the info on Beaker Street. I used to listen to it in Port Arthur, Texas as a 13 year old on a transister radio late at night with the covers pulled over my head so no one else could hear this wild music coming from another world. The magic is still with me.

The Mighty Favog said...

I wonder what sopmething like "Beaker Street" would sound like today, if you were starting from scratch and doing true freeform radio?

After all, we're in a WAAAAAAY rougher patch, broadcastingwise, than we were in 1966, as stations have hyperformated themselves and the human element is fading . . . fading . . . fading fast.

I've devoted myself to trying to reimagine freeform radio in a contemporary context, and to seeing whether we can broaden the concept a little bit more. At least, within reason.

I'd be interested in your opinion of what I've come up with these past couple of years or so. It's true "progressive, freeform" radio, only not on the radio. And it's an attempt at doing freeform with some slicked-up production values. And doing it in a multimedia fashion -- a show coupled with a blog and a website, in an attempt to keep the "conversation" going with audio AND the written word.

Here are the links:

http://www.revolution21.podomatic.com/

http://www.revolution21.org/
(this links to everything)

Barefoot Maven said...

I live in Little Rock, AR, and Beaker Street is on the Point 94.1 now -- it was on Magic 105 for years until recently but that station was sort of absorbed by the Clear Station people. Dale (aka Clyde Clifford) is still the DJ and still plays the same kind of music, old and new but mostly old. I used to work with him at his "day job."

I noticed just now that Wikipedia is about to delete the entry on Beaker Street. Says the author failed to say why the show was important. Maybe the article has been updated because I thought it was ok. All you have to do is google Beaker Street to find out why it was and is important. Plenty of folks around the country remember it fondly. Thank goodness it's still around here in Arkansas.